Zero Trust Engineering — Incident-to-automated-remediation workflow

/02 About

Cross-domain integration engineering reference for incident-to-automated-remediation workflow, including policy, logical interfaces, recovery and assurance.

Purpose: Incident-to-automated-remediation workflow. Domain: Cross-domain integration. Family: lifecycle. Scenario trigger: Convert verified security incident into authorized response action. Input assurance: Incident severity, source evidence, target criticality and approvals. Evaluation: Evaluate remediation permission and safety preconditions. Governing policy: Incident response change control and automation blast-radius policy. Resource-side obligation: Execute bounded containment and verify postcondition. Protected concern: Enterprise security automation target service. Logical interface: Incident ID severity action owner target approval precondition and closure. Evidence: Incident case response approval action and verification evidence. Failure: Unverified incident triggers unsafe mass isolation. Required recovery: Stop automation and require independent incident escalation. Architectural invariant: Detection of compromise does not inherently authorize disruptive remediation Adoption: replace reference roles with concrete owner-controlled services. Specify exact provider/consumer identities, schema fields and classifications, signal provenance and freshness, idempotency, authorization lifetime, timeout/retry limits, observation and tamper evidence. A denied or failed operation must not silently become a permitted one. Scope: original vendor-neutral, implementation-agnostic technical reference model. Illustrative logical components and behaviors are neither a deployed system nor evidence of regulatory compliance. Package identities remain stable within the package; cross-package semantic reconciliation requires separate explicit registry support.

Curated · other · unspecified · Published by Lattix · 29 elements · 34 relationships · validated on publish