CSA Zero Trust microsegmentation
securityv1/01 Views
/02 About
Implement policy-defined network/workload isolation with topology and connection-defined enforcement, exception governance, drift monitoring and auditable decisions
Purpose: Implement policy-defined network/workload isolation with topology and connection-defined enforcement, exception governance, drift monitoring and auditable decisions. Reading the diagrams: Architecture landscape contains the complete semantic model. Governance and delivery isolates organizational decisions and enabling services. Delivery and assurance isolates runtime capabilities, controls, stewardship and evidence. Adoption: this is a reference architecture, not proof of implementation or regulatory compliance. Replace generic roles with actual owners and solutions. Record decisions, scope, constraints, interfaces, data classification, implementation status and evidence. Verify all applicable policies and control objectives against the current official source. Source and attribution: original Arq interpretation informed by https://cloudsecurityalliance.org/artifacts/zero-trust-microsegmentation-guidance. No official source artwork is reproduced, and no endorsement or certification by the source publisher is implied.
Published by Lattix · 12 elements · 13 relationships · validated on publish
/03 Contents
- Role
- Protected service owner
- Process
- Map authorized flows, Exception revalidation
- Policy
- Segmentation intent
- Data Domain
- Protect surface
- Application Component
- Policy distribution, Topology-defined enforcement, Connection-defined admission, Flow telemetry, Policy drift detection
- Application
- Protected workload
- Data Store
- Enforcement evidence