Zero Trust Engineering — Security architecture decision governance

/02 About

Governance and assurance engineering reference for security architecture decision governance, including policy, logical interfaces, recovery and assurance.

Purpose: Security architecture decision governance. Domain: Governance and assurance. Family: governance. Scenario trigger: Submit architecture decision or exception for review. Input assurance: Requirements, risks, alternative controls and proposed boundary changes. Evaluation: Evaluate design consistency and control obligations. Governing policy: Architecture design authority, decision record and waiver policy. Resource-side obligation: Record approved design with measurable acceptance conditions. Protected concern: Enterprise Zero Trust architecture repository. Logical interface: Decision ID alternatives rationale control impact approver and condition. Evidence: Architecture decision constraints tradeoffs and reviewer outcome. Failure: Control bypass introduced without architecture review. Required recovery: Reject design and require approved compensating mechanism. Architectural invariant: Architecture decisions must preserve traceability to security invariants Adoption: replace reference roles with concrete owner-controlled services. Specify exact provider/consumer identities, schema fields and classifications, signal provenance and freshness, idempotency, authorization lifetime, timeout/retry limits, observation and tamper evidence. A denied or failed operation must not silently become a permitted one. Scope: original vendor-neutral, implementation-agnostic technical reference model. Illustrative logical components and behaviors are neither a deployed system nor evidence of regulatory compliance. Package identities remain stable within the package; cross-package semantic reconciliation requires separate explicit registry support.

Curated · other · unspecified · Published by Lattix · 29 elements · 34 relationships · validated on publish