Zero Trust Engineering — Incident detection and case correlation

/02 About

Visibility and analytics engineering reference for incident detection and case correlation, including policy, logical interfaces, recovery and assurance.

Purpose: Incident detection and case correlation. Domain: Visibility and analytics. Family: assurance. Scenario trigger: Promote security detection to incident investigation. Input assurance: Correlated alert context, asset criticality and threat evidence. Evaluation: Assess common incident scope, confidence and severity. Governing policy: Incident case creation, escalation and response policy. Resource-side obligation: Open evidence-linked incident with controlled response owners. Protected concern: Enterprise security case management service. Logical interface: Detection IDs asset graph analyst finding severity and case timeline. Evidence: Incident linkage triage status and chain of custody. Failure: Alert storm, duplicate case or misattributed incident. Required recovery: Merge or split cases through audited analyst decision. Architectural invariant: Incident severity and scope must be justified by traceable evidence Adoption: replace reference roles with concrete owner-controlled services. Specify exact provider/consumer identities, schema fields and classifications, signal provenance and freshness, idempotency, authorization lifetime, timeout/retry limits, observation and tamper evidence. A denied or failed operation must not silently become a permitted one. Scope: original vendor-neutral, implementation-agnostic technical reference model. Illustrative logical components and behaviors are neither a deployed system nor evidence of regulatory compliance. Package identities remain stable within the package; cross-package semantic reconciliation requires separate explicit registry support.

Curated · other · unspecified · Published by Lattix · 29 elements · 33 relationships · validated on publish