Zero Trust Engineering — End-to-end Zero Trust assurance and evidence model
securityv1/01 Views
/02 About
Cross-domain integration engineering reference for end-to-end zero trust assurance and evidence model, including policy, logical interfaces, recovery and assurance.
Purpose: End-to-end Zero Trust assurance and evidence model. Domain: Cross-domain integration. Family: assurance. Scenario trigger: Verify security control chain across identity to protected data. Input assurance: Policy decisions, device trust, workload context and resource enforcement. Evaluation: Correlate authoritative evidence to architecture invariants. Governing policy: End-to-end control conformance, evidence and retention policy. Resource-side obligation: Publish signed conformance result with missing coverage explicitly marked. Protected concern: Enterprise Zero Trust assurance and architecture review. Logical interface: Access trace subject device service data policy control evidence and test. Evidence: Control chain trace expected outcome observed result and reviewer evidence. Failure: Unprovable permit path or missing negative test evidence. Required recovery: Flag architecture nonconforming and require scoped remediation. Architectural invariant: Claims of Zero Trust effectiveness require verified end-to-end enforcement Adoption: replace reference roles with concrete owner-controlled services. Specify exact provider/consumer identities, schema fields and classifications, signal provenance and freshness, idempotency, authorization lifetime, timeout/retry limits, observation and tamper evidence. A denied or failed operation must not silently become a permitted one. Scope: original vendor-neutral, implementation-agnostic technical reference model. Illustrative logical components and behaviors are neither a deployed system nor evidence of regulatory compliance. Package identities remain stable within the package; cross-package semantic reconciliation requires separate explicit registry support.
Curated · other · unspecified · Published by Lattix · 29 elements · 33 relationships · validated on publish
/03 Contents
- Capability
- Cross-domain integration, End-to-end Zero Trust assurance and evidence model
- Role
- Cross-domain integration owner
- Business Actor
- Security telemetry or evidence producer
- Activity
- Verify security control chain across identity to protected data, Verify: Policy decisions, device trust, workload context and resource enforcement, Assess: Correlate authoritative evidence to architecture invariants, Execute: Publish signed conformance result with missing coverage explicitly marked, Exception: Unprovable permit path or missing negative test evidence, Recover: Flag architecture nonconforming and require scoped remediation, Verify and disposition finding
- Application Component
- Policy decisions, device trust, workload context and resource enforcement, Correlate authoritative evidence to architecture invariants, Publish signed conformance result with missing coverage explicitly marked, Authenticated observation source, Detection and evidence correlation
- Application
- Enterprise Zero Trust assurance and architecture review
- Policy
- End-to-end control conformance, evidence and retention policy
- API
- End-to-end Zero Trust assurance and evidence model logical interface
- Message/Event Schema
- Access trace subject device service data policy control evidence and test
- Data Store
- Control chain trace expected outcome observed result and reviewer evidence, Versioned technical finding
- Control
- End-to-end Zero Trust assurance and evidence model enforcement assurance
- Risk
- Unprovable permit path or missing negative test evidence risk
- Requirement
- Claims of Zero Trust effectiveness require verified end-to-end enforcement
- Measure
- End-to-end Zero Trust assurance and evidence model assurance completeness
- Trust Boundary
- End-to-end Zero Trust assurance and evidence model authority boundary
- State
- Control condition verified, Control gap or untrusted signal