Zero Trust Engineering — Control objective to architecture mapping

/02 About

Governance and assurance engineering reference for control objective to architecture mapping, including policy, logical interfaces, recovery and assurance.

Purpose: Control objective to architecture mapping. Domain: Governance and assurance. Family: governance. Scenario trigger: Associate control objective with implementable logical service. Input assurance: Control requirement, protected asset and technical enforcement evidence. Evaluation: Verify control coverage and trace to intended decision point. Governing policy: Control-to-capability mapping and effectiveness policy. Resource-side obligation: Publish reviewed control traceability and missing-coverage findings. Protected concern: Enterprise security control register. Logical interface: Control objective capability service implementation evidence and gap. Evidence: Control objective mapped implementation verification and ownership. Failure: Declared control lacks real enforcement or measurable evidence. Required recovery: Classify control as unverified and require compensating design. Architectural invariant: Mapping a control to a diagram is not proof of operating control Adoption: replace reference roles with concrete owner-controlled services. Specify exact provider/consumer identities, schema fields and classifications, signal provenance and freshness, idempotency, authorization lifetime, timeout/retry limits, observation and tamper evidence. A denied or failed operation must not silently become a permitted one. Scope: original vendor-neutral, implementation-agnostic technical reference model. Illustrative logical components and behaviors are neither a deployed system nor evidence of regulatory compliance. Package identities remain stable within the package; cross-package semantic reconciliation requires separate explicit registry support.

Curated · other · unspecified · Published by Lattix · 29 elements · 34 relationships · validated on publish